Ballhype Feedback and Updates - I Absolutely HATE the New Ballhype Theme

  • Zorgon Zorgon
    low-rated comment [show] -1
    • louismg louismg
      +1

      Zorgon, it should remind you of ShowHype because they are in the same family, created by the same people and designed by the same crew.

      Change can be hard for some folks, but not only is this a better look overall, but I already like it better than the prior round.

      Erin explains: http://blog.ballhype.com/2007/11/21/ballhype-reloaded/

      (new) Posted 11/22/2007 [reply] [flag]
      • Zorgon Zorgon
        low-rated comment [show] -1
        • TheHype TheHype
          +3

          Zorgs, how about this, give this a good week. I too had a little bit of reservations at first, but I've come around to it.

          Makes it neater you know?

          (new) Posted 11/22/2007 [reply] [flag]
        • Erin Erin
          +3

          But how do you really feel? :-)

          OK, so we know not everyone is going to like the new design. That said, it’s a bummer that it’s making you sick -- not the visceral type of reaction we’re aiming for. It's Thanksgiving, so I’m going to take the optimistic approach and hope that the stadium lights and sleek blue voting widgets grow on you.

          (new) Posted 11/22/2007 [reply] [flag]
          • Zorgon Zorgon
            0

            Hold the phone!

             Major problem: Whenever I pick correctly or incorrectly, it stays blue and doesnt turn into red or green. Noooooooo!!!! Now it makes it just that much more difficult to skim through NCAA Basketball.

            (new) Posted 11/22/2007 [reply] [flag]
            • Jason Jason
              +3
              Our mistake--it's back to green & red now.
              (new) Posted 11/22/2007 [reply] [flag]
  • Tbone42 Tbone42
    +4
    I dig it, looks better.
    (new) Posted 11/22/2007 [reply] [flag]
  • Redsauce Redsauce
    +1
    I got to admit I don't really like this new theme.  I like the old theme--it was a simpler, a not-too-flashy feel to it.  The new theme's like giving Angelina Jolie a face-lift.  Why bother when it's already great?
    (new) Posted 11/22/2007 [reply] [flag]
    • Erin Erin
      +1
      Thanks for the feedback. We wouldn't do plastic surgery on Angelina Jolie either, but even she needs a new wardrobe once in a while, which is why we left the layout, navigation and site functionality intact.
      (new) Posted 11/22/2007 [reply] [flag]
  • Doberman On The Diamond Doberman On The Diamond
    +2
    I really like the new look. A little more stimulating and professional, so to speak. It's not so much that it's distracting. Just simple, which was the right move. So, for what it's worth (probably very little), you have my approval.
    (new) Posted 11/23/2007 [reply] [flag]
  • Erin Erin
    +1

    Thanks DOTD and Tbone42 for your comments - very much appreciated.

    (new) Posted 11/23/2007 [reply] [flag]
  • tdaloisio tdaloisio
    +2
    While I think most things you all are doing are excellent, I must say, I am not a fan of the new colors.  I appreciate some of the other subtle changes.  But would love the option to skin to Ballhype Classic where everything that is blue is white and the yellow glow around things dissapears.  Could you add a css layer that would accomodate switching basic skin?
    (new) Posted 11/26/2007 [reply] [flag]
    • Erin Erin
      +3
      Unfortunately, maintaining two skins for the site would be a major headache. If I find goggles that achieve the same effect, I'll add them to the BallHype store...
      (new) Posted 11/26/2007 [reply] [flag]
      • bobman024 bobman024
        +1
        I really like the skin idea if it is something that can be planned for in the future. Otherwise I likewise appreciate some of the graphic enhancements and subtle changes. But the ability to chose between a few other colors would be neat in the future...
        (new) Posted 11/26/2007 [reply] [flag]
      • Zorgon Zorgon
        +1
        I demand BallHype time machine goggles!
        (new) Posted 11/27/2007 [reply] [flag]