valentinesviews.blogspot.com - 6/15/2007
—
Now that the San Antonio Spurs have dispatched the Cleveland LeBrons in four mostly non-competitive games to sweep the NBA Finals and win their fourth title in 9 seasons, the question becomes where do the Spurs rank among the great NBA teams?
Are they better than the Celtics and Lakers of the '80s? Robert Horry thinks so. I think not.
Comments
Related Content
Robert Horry: Spurs Would Beat Larry's Celtics and Magic's Lakers
larrybrownsports.com 6/14/2007 — Yup, Robert Horry said it, the Spurs could beat those dominant teams from the 80s. He says there are things today's players can do that wasn't being done back then. Is he crazy? Could the Spurs take the 80s Lakers and Celtics?
Why The Spurs Are NOT A Dynasty
winningtheturnoverbattle.blogspot.com 6/15/2007 — Simply put, the Spurs should not be called a dynasty, and here are the reasons why. No repeats, Lakers 3-Peat, '99 being cheap, lack of regular season dominance, and the simple fact that they have won less than half of the titles during their current run. Don't be deceived, big daddy media is just feeding you the best story, even if it cheapens the real dynasties of the past.
Asterisks for everyone
100percentinjuryrate.blogspot.com 6/15/2007 — *not an officially recognized championship Now that the Spurs have "won" the championship, which we're not recognizing and we'll go into more detail on in a moment, we're presented with a strange case. Robert Horry now has more championship rings ...
Behold… The Mighty Remora Fish!!
redsarmy.wordpress.com 6/15/2007 — Robert Horry is perhaps the most skilled player in all of NBA history…. at latching onto the coattails of superstars and winning championships. He’s the remora fish of the NBA… he hooks onto the biggest, baddest NBA stars… and then he gets rings for it. Hey, congratulations Robert… for having the ability to stand on the wing while guys with 20 times your ability draw defenders away ...
posted by ETVal
vote down
flag
