danshanoff.com - 6/14/2007
—
Just kidding, of course... but am I? Certainly, this Spurs team can't be ranked ahead of Jordan's Bulls*, but can they be ranked No. 2 just behind -- and ahead of such dynasties as the 1980s Lakers, 1980s Celtics or 2000s Lakers? I say yes... As everyone talks about the Spurs as a "dynasty" for winning their 4th title in 9 years, I'd like to self-servingly point out that I called the Spurs ...
Comments
Blog Reactions
Spurs Dynasty ranks behind Lakers, Celtics and Bulls
FanIQ Blog —
... Dan Shanoff chimed in with the inevitable debate: Who is the best Dynasty of this era (Clearly the 60s Celtics would beat everyone) and where do the Spurs rank?
Some excellent stuff from out there in the Blogosphere…
With Malice - An LA Lakers blog, news and opinions —
... Dan Shanoff brings up the ‘D’ word… Dynasty!… [Dan Shanoff]
Related Content
Teams That Always Need To Be Good
justcallmejuice.blogspot.com 6/14/2007 — As we found out earlier this week, no one is watching the NBA Finals. Game 1 was the lowest rated Game 1 in history and Game 2 was beaten by The Sopranos to remain . While the numbers were still better than the NHL's abysmal numbers, no one outside ...
Robert Horry: Spurs Would Beat Larry's Celtics and Magic's Lakers
larrybrownsports.com 6/14/2007 — Yup, Robert Horry said it, the Spurs could beat those dominant teams from the 80s. He says there are things today's players can do that wasn't being done back then. Is he crazy? Could the Spurs take the 80s Lakers and Celtics?
Worst Finals Ever Nears Merciful End
depressedfan.com 6/14/2007 — The Spurs took a 3–0 lead tonight in what could’ve been the most boring game in the history of boring games. Final score, 75–72 .
To commemorate the worst NBA Finals ever, I did a quick search on YouTube for a few videos I’d ...
Why The Spurs Are NOT A Dynasty
winningtheturnoverbattle.blogspot.com 6/15/2007 — Simply put, the Spurs should not be called a dynasty, and here are the reasons why. No repeats, Lakers 3-Peat, '99 being cheap, lack of regular season dominance, and the simple fact that they have won less than half of the titles during their current run. Don't be deceived, big daddy media is just feeding you the best story, even if it cheapens the real dynasties of the past.
Spurs better than '80s Celtics or Lakers? No way
valentinesviews.blogspot.com 6/15/2007 — Now that the San Antonio Spurs have dispatched the Cleveland LeBrons in four mostly non-competitive games to sweep the NBA Finals and win their fourth title in 9 seasons, the question becomes where do the Spurs rank among the great NBA teams?
Are they better than the Celtics and Lakers of the '80s? Robert Horry thinks so. I think not.
